From AWE to WISE
WisdomK12’s model for adapting to the future of teaching
The History of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE)
The origins of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) date back to the 1960s, when Ellis Page developed Project Essay Grade (PEG), one of the first systems to use statistical models for analyzing and scoring written text. PEG’s groundbreaking approach marked the beginning of automated assessment tools that quantified text features like word frequency and structure to assign scores. Over the following decades, AWE systems evolved dramatically, leveraging advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP).
In the 1990s, systems such as e-rater and IntelliMetric brought automated essay scoring into widespread use, incorporating more sophisticated algorithms to evaluate grammar, organization, and style. These tools were first applied in high-stakes testing environments like the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) and Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL), where scalability and objectivity were critical.
By the 2000s, AWE systems began shifting from merely scoring essays to providing formative feedback, enabling students to improve their writing through iterative revisions. However, the initial systems had limitations, including a reliance on surface-level metrics (e.g., sentence length, vocabulary usage) and struggles with nuanced aspects of language, such as creativity, cultural references, and context.
While AWE has laid a strong foundation, the complexities of modern education demand tools that go beyond evaluation. Enter WISE—the Writing Insight & Support Ecosystem—a platform that redefines what writing tools can achieve.
Key Phases in AWE’s Evolution
1960s-1980s: Statistical Foundations
Development of PEG and initial efforts to automate scoring based on quantifiable features of text.
1990s: Integration of AI and NLP
Emergence of tools like e-rater that combined machine learning and language processing for scoring and limited feedback.
2000s-Present: Transition to Growth-Oriented Tools
Expansion into formative feedback systems aimed at improving student writing proficiency.
Adoption of AWE in classrooms alongside traditional human evaluation to address scalability and workload challenges.
Core Features of AWE
Traditional AWE tools focus on the following foundational functionalities. These "table stakes" are essential but are no longer transformative on their own:
Encouraging Feedback: Provides students with immediate responses to their writing, primarily focused on grammar and syntax.
Automated Scoring: Utilizes algorithms to score essays based on pre-defined metrics like length, structure, and vocabulary.
Scalability: Handles large volumes of student writing with consistency and efficiency.
Objective Evaluation: Ensures bias-free scoring through standardized criteria.
Ease of Use: Designed with ease of use as a fundamental design requirement.
How WISE Transforms AWE
WISE builds on the foundations of AWE and elevates its capabilities to create an empowering, growth-oriented ecosystem.
| Table Stake | Traditional AWE Capability | WISE Differentiator |
|---|---|---|
| Instant Feedback | Focused on grammar and syntax corrections | Provides growth-oriented, actionable, and encouraging feedback that inspires confidence and iterative improvement. |
| Automated Scoring | Relies on surface-level metrics (e.g., word count) | Incorporates a next-generation assessment framework designed to optimize both speed and thoroughness, ensuring efficient and in-depth evaluations. |
| Scalability | Processes high volumes but sacrifices depth | Seamlessly scales while delivering detailed, customizable insights aligned with specific educational standards. |
| Objective Evaluation | Uniform scoring with limited flexibility | Employs refined accuracy techniques to ensure consistent and fair evaluations across diverse student submissions, adapting to contextual needs. |
| Ease of Use | Basic functionality for minimal disruption | Designed for intuitive educator workflows, supporting effortless integration into various teaching environments. |
WISE Differentiators
-
Empowering Teachers: Reduces grading workload, enabling educators to focus on deeper instructional relationships.
Student-Centric Growth: Provides formative, actionable feedback designed to encourage iterative improvement rather than punitive error correction.
-
Built by Educators for Educators: Practical, standards-aligned design ensures seamless integration into classroom workflows.
Professional Development: Accredited programs like Act 48 credits help educators master AI-enhanced instruction.
-
Next-Generation Assessment Framework: Incorporates a next-generation assessment framework designed to optimize both speed and thoroughness.
Refined Accuracy Techniques: Ensures consistent and fair evaluations across diverse student submissions.
-
Customizable Rubrics: Tailored assessment tools meet specific classroom, district, or state needs, ensuring alignment with varying standards like Pennsylvania’s TDA.
Student-Centered Insights: Future features will include tools to assess students’ writing interests, abilities, lesson engagement, and more, enabling personalized and effective learning experiences.
-
Teacher and Administrator Insights: Offers detailed analytics to identify trends, track progress, and allocate resources effectively.
Long-Term Vision: Positioned as a holistic solution that modernizes teaching while fostering student success.
